I'd love to test Mozilla Thunderbird except..

I’d love to give Thunderbird a spin for a few days but there’s a problem. It doesn’t support the Maildir format!
Currently I’m very happy with Kmail and lots of my mail folders are in Maildir format. I’ve over 1GB of mail (yes Mark, I still keep almost all my mail!) so having an easy way of exporting it to another format is important.
There is a feature request in the Mozilla bug database but it hasn’t seen any developer attention in a few months. 🙁
I could always start from scratch again with Thunderbird. Copy over the contents of my inbox and archive the really old mail in a tar ball. hmm. Nah, the last time I moved mail clients it was to move from the Netscape 4.7 client (used for years) to Kmail. I don’t know that there’s as much of a reason to move from Kmail now. (Well, besides the fact that I don’t use any other KDE application!)
Before you think, “He’s going to write a script to convert those formats!” No, I have too many plenty of other ways to scratch an itch!
I’ll let this one up to someone else.

teergrubing referrer spammers

Justin Mason posted a message to the ILUG complaining about referer spam on his blog. I replied with a few ideas, and hopefully we’ll get more ideas on that thread. Unfortunately I forgot to include a link to a useful feedster search on the matter but JM will see it here I’m sure.

  1. Load up the referering page. If it doesn’t load then ignore the referer (removes private pages on intranets). Check the page for a link to your site, and in particular, checl for the url the refering ‘browser’ visited. If it’s not there, then ignore the referer.
  2. Setup a moderation system and manually filter the referers.
  3. Only print a referer after they’ve refered more than a couple of visitors. (Only mildly effective however.)
  4. Dave Winer at Userland added a robots.txt to his referer log page. It stops
    Google indexing that page. He then notified the world of what he did, and hopefully the spammers got the message.

Mozilla Firebird 0.6.1

A new release of Mozilla Firebird is out! I’ve been using the XFT/GTK2 builds available elsewhere for the past week or so and I’m well impressed by stability recently. The one major bug I found, (as did everyone else it seems), was the auto-complete bug, and that’s certainly been fixed. I’m rushing out the door, but search my blog for ‘xft’ to find the download site for those nice looking nightly builds.

Tab cleanup and other notes

Horribly busy in work these days. More articles I’ll read when I have time.

  1. Shirky: A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy
  2. McNealy Weighs In on Linux, Unix, Sun – Compares Linux to Napster – Linux is copyright theft? That’s what SCO would have you believe I suppose.
  3. Gadgetopia – ‘nother weblog but with some stuff I hadn’t seen elsewhere.

On another note, I managed to boot my PC at home again. The hardrive died on it just after I got back from Chicago, but I’ve managed to recover most of the files off it. I’m now using an almost 10 year old Quantam 51/4” drive. It doesn’t boot unless I add root=/dev/hdb1 to the end of the LILO command line.. *ggrrr* It’ll suffice for WordPress development however!

BlogShares – why hoard?

I’m obviously missing something here, or maybe it’s in the docs but I didn’t read that paragraph. Why do people hoard shares of a particular blog on BlogShares?
Is it to show support for that site? Is it a longterm investment? (that could be one possible answer, if you expect a site to be linked to heavily it’s going to increase in value.)
My blog has a few investors who are in for the long haul. I recently sold all my stock in my blog and made a tidy profit, but if there’s no liquidity, then it’s just paper money (ok, never mind the fact that it’s all virtual money anyway..)
If you check my Blogshares profile you’ll see I have a few shares in davespicks.com. Why do I keep them? Dave’s a nice guy, and gave me shares in his site. Share dealing hasn’t been very liquid though so I’ve held on to them in the belief that someone else will sell and I can buy a few more shares at a cut down price.
Huh. Greed. As simple as that!