Ethically uncomplicated stem cells

Science is rescuing us from moral mazes says Andrew Sullivan in last weekend’s Sunday Times. He was referring to the discovery that stem cells could be made from human skin cells. Unfortunately the scientists who made the discovery had to use a cancer gene and a retro virus but this should be a big boost for this branch of research and remove a lot of the ethical questions surrounding the destruction of embryos. (Via Dangerousmeta)

  • Photography Ireland forums.
  • Cork Places on Flickr. Get to know the city and county where I live.
  • Copyright plugin for the GIMP. I’d hate to do it, but I might start watermarking my images.
  • Following on from his post on photography as a career, Paul now points at “What do you wish you’d known when you started out?” in EPUK.
  • Doomsday brings DOOM up to date with modern technology. Retro Gamer magazine features DOOM on it’s front cover. I can’t believe it was released in 1993! I remember playing deathmatch DOOM II in college, and before then trying to deathmatch against my friend Brian using a modem and calling his house. Doomsday available for Mac OS X, Linux and Windows. It works really well on my Macbook. I spent an enjoyable hour on it last night blasting monsters, soldiers, sergeants and commandos. I love mouse look! Watch out for those glowing fireballs! Unfortunately the pressure of supporting a GPLed product drove one of it’s developers away. The Duke Nukem guys take a much harder line:


    Tough luck. Do NOT contact us with bug reports at this time. Do NOT contact us if you can’t get it to build. Do NOT contact us for copies of the game. In fact, if you aren’t sending us code, don’t contact us at all.

  • Now to look over the Quake engines available.
ouch! pointer in the eye!

via when pointers attack

4 thoughts on “Ethically uncomplicated stem cells

  1. Andrew Sullivan is a dubious source of information.

    The scientists who made this discovery have already stated that Bush’s restrictions on funding set back this area of science by years and that the discovery doesn’t obviate the need for embryonic cells.

    In all honesty the debate is ridiculous. Every day thousands of embryos are spontaneously aborted. Pregnancy is a risky event and loads of things can cause it to end early. Genetics, stress, illness, diet, etc, etc. We as a society let millions of born humans starve to death and allow/cause millions more to die in war.

    Even without that context I find nothing morally troubling with abortion, but within that context I find overblown concern about abortion morally troubling.

  2. Many people do find abortion troubling though, and they have a strong voice. I see this as a step in the right direction. If you can placate those who object to embryonic cell research isn’t that a good thing?

  3. Again, it does not replace the role of embryonic stem cells in research. So what it means is that people with diabetes and other diseases that could be helped will die waiting.

    So no, I don’t much care about who it placates. Placating ignorant people in a way that causes others to die or suffer is morally wrong.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this:

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.